There is a part of “curation jail” that Shaunta didn’t address, so thought I’d take a stab at it.

Medium’s guide says:

Shaunta addresses the latter reason, a writer’s past curation acceptance.
The first reason listed is equally important, if not more so.

It’s true that a writer’s “past curation acceptance rate” affects whether you get sent to “curation jail” or not. But what do you think causes the writer’s past curation rate?

The curator’s quality judgement.

Here’s another way to say quality judgement — sorry, we don’t think this is of sufficient quality to distribute. I know, that sounds awful, but that’s what they’re essentially saying.

If you read between the lines, “past curation acceptance” is just reputation. Does a writer have a reputation for good writing?

When a writer earns a reputation for good writing, that doesn’t mean all their articles get curated. But it does mean they’ve earned the reputation of being worth a look, every time.

I don’t think the phrase “curation jail” is doing anyone any favors. It portrays punishment, but that’s not what’s happening. It’s simply that the writer needs to earn the reputation of consistently being worth a read. That’s not jail and it’s not a punishment. It’s just a product of the sheer number of writers here.

Written by

Top writer. Featured in NYT, Forbes.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store